An Investigation into the Impact of Motivational Determinants on Language Learners’ Learning in a Military University

Authors

1 Ph.D. student Hakim Sabzevari, Department of English Language and Literature

2 Assistant Professor at Hakim Sabzevari University, Department of English Language and Literature

Abstract

Introduction: This paper examines the effect of motivational determinants on learners’ language learning development in an intensive language learning course.
Method: Ninety-four language learners, aged 20 to 30, from a military university in Tehran participated in this study. They completed a translated, adapted version of Gardner’s Motivation-Attitude Test Battery.
Results: Four key constructs, namely motivation, integrative motivation, organizational influence, and anxiety, were obtained from the analysis of the test. The results revealed that integrative motivation predicts language learning development positively, and motivation can be considered a predictor for language learning development while organizational influence is considered a negative predictor for language learning development.
Discussion: The study confirms that all other factors being equal, motivation is the most important determinant of language learning. The wider concluding remark of this research is that motivation is context dependent and any language learning context is unique in this regard and has its own motivational model. 

Keywords


Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher Motivation Strategies, Student Perceptions, Student Motivation, and English Achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Febbraro, A., McKee, B. & Riedel, S. (2008): Multinational military operations and intercultural factors. North Atlantic treaty Organization, Research and Technology Organization: Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France
Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R.C. (2001) Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical Report No. 23 ,  pp.1-19). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.)
Masgoret, A. M.; Gardner, R. C. (2003) Attitudes, motivation and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, pp. 167-210.
Rost, M. (2006) Generating student motivation. Retrieved January, 2012, from www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/worldview/motivation.pdf .
Shirbagi N. (2010) Orientations and attitudes Of Iranian University Students for English  Language Learning. PEDAGOGIKA. 2010.99.
Stewart, K., Clarke, H., Goillau, P., Verrall, N. & Widdowson, M. (2004): Non-technical interoperability in multinational forces. In proceedings of the 9th international Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 14-16 September 2004. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vaezi, Z. (2008) Language Learning Motivation among Iranian Undergraduate Students, World Applied Sciences Journal 5 (1): 54-61.            
Yamashiro A.D.; McLaughlin J. (2001) Relationships among attitudes, motivation, anxiety, and English language proficiency in Japanese college students. In : Second Language Acquisition Research in Japan .Eds. P.Robinson, M. Sawyer, S. Ross. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching, pp. 113–127.