بررسی نقش میانجی گری باورهای ارتباطی در رابطه بین انتظارات زناشویی با کیفیت زندگی زناشویی در خانواده های نظامی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی گچساران، گچساران، ایران

2 دانشگاه شهید رجایی

3 علامه طباطبایی

4 کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی نقش میانجی گری باورهای ارتباطی در رابطه بین انتظارات زناشویی با کیفیت زندگی زناشویی در خانواده های نظامیبود. روش پژوهش همبستگی از نوع تحلیل مسیر بود. جامعه پژوهش خانوارهای نظامی شهر تهران در سال 1401 بود که از بین آنها 204 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری در هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش حاضر را پرسشنامه انتظارات زناشویی امیدوار و همکاران (1387، پرسشنامه کیفیت زناشویی باسبی، کران، لارسن و کریستنسن(2005) و باورهای غیرمنطقی در زندگی زناشویی ایدلسن و اپستین (1981) تشکیل دادند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده‌ها شان می‌دهد اثر مستقیم انتظارات زناشویی (41/0-=β) و باورهای ارتباطی (36/0-=β) بر کیفیت زندگی مورد تأیید قرار گرفت( 05/0P< ) و انتظارات زناشویی بر باورهای ارتباطی (05/1=β) اثر مستقیم دارند( 05/0P< ). همچنین اثر غیرمستقیم انتظارات زناشویی (38/0-=β)بر کیفیت زندگی زناشویی زوجین نظامی در سطح 05/0 معنی‌دار است. بنابرین نتایج پژوهش حاکی از برازش مطلوب مدل تحلیل مسیر نقش میانجی گری باورهای ارتباطی در رابطه بین انتظارات زناشویی با کیفیت زندگی زناشویی در خانواده های نظامی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the mediating role of communication beliefs in the relationship between marital expectations and the quality of marital life in military families

نویسندگان [English]

  • SeyedehMones Hosseini 1
  • sajjad Bagheri 2
  • سرمست شوشتری Sarmast Shushtari 3
  • Ali Ghorban nezad 4
1 PhD in Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Gachsaran, Gachsaran, Iran
2 Shahidrajaei univercity
3 Allameh Tabatabai University
4 Master of Counseling, Allameh Tabatabai University
چکیده [English]

he purpose of this study was to investigate the mediating role of communication beliefs in the relationship between marital expectations and the quality of marital life in military families. The method of correlational research was path analysis. The research population was the military households of Tehran in 1401, from which 204 people were selected by purposive sampling. The tools of the present research were the Marital Expectations Questionnaire of Omdered et al. (2017), the Marital Quality Questionnaire of Busby, Karan, Larsen, and Christensen (2005) and Idelsen and Epstein's Irrational Beliefs in Marital Life (1981). The results of the data analysis show The direct effect of marital expectations (β=-0.41) and communication beliefs (β=-0.36) on quality of life was confirmed (P<0.05) and marital expectations on communication beliefs (β=1.05) directly (P<0.05). Also, the indirect effect of marital expectations (β=-0.38) on the quality of married life of military couples is significant at the level of 0.05. Therefore, the results of the research indicate the favorable fit of the path analysis model of the mediating role of beliefs. There is a relationship between marital expectations and the quality of marital life in military families.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Marital life quality
  • communication beliefs
  • marital expectations
  • military families

Smiley face

بخشوده، اسماء؛ بهرامی، احسان و رضازاده، محمدرضا. (1393). نقش انتظارات زناشویی و ارتباط های سالم (مناسبات زوجی دین محور) در پیش بینی کیفیت زندگی. فصلنامه علوم روان‌شناختی، 4(43)، 34-45.
درخشان، دینا. (1398). اثربخشی آموزش ذهن‌آگاهی بر کیفیت زندگی زناشویی و سازگاری زناشویی معتادان نگهدارنده متادون شهرکرد. مجله پیشرفت‌های اخیر در روانشناسی، علوم تربیتی و تعلیم و تربیت، 2(12)، 12-30
یوسفی، ناصر (1390). بررسی شاخص‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس کیفیت زناشویی، فرم تجدیدنظر شده (RDAS). پژوهش‌های روان‌شناسی بالینی و مشاوره، 1 (2)، 200-183
Amy, D., Damon, E, Jones, Mark, E. Feinberg. (2012). Enduring Vulnerabilities, Relationship Attributions and couple conflict: An integrative model of the occurrence and frecuency of intimate partner violence. Journal of family psychology, 25(5):709-718
Andres, M. (2014). Distress, support, and relationship satisfaction during military-induced separations: A longitudinal study among spouses of Dutch deployed military personnel. Psychological Services, 11, 22-30. doi:10.1037/a0033750
Baugher, A. R., & Gazmararian, J. A. (2015). Masculine gender role stress and violence: A literature review and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 107–112.
Beam, C. R., Marcus, K., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2018). Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality. Behavior Genetics, 48(3), 209–223. doi:10.1007/s10519-018-9892-4 
Busby. D. M., Crane. D. R., Larson. J. H., & Christensen. C. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct Hierarchy and multidimensional scale. Journal of Marital and family therapy, 21, 289-308.
Bushatz, A. (2019, May 20). Troop divorce rate continues slow but steady decline. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/05/20/troop-divorce-rate-continuesslow-steady-decline.html
Clyde, T. L., Hawkins, A. J., & Willoughby B. J. (2020). Revising premarital relationship interventions for the next generation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 46(1): 149-164
Dew J., & Jackson M. (2018). Commitment and Relationship Maintenance Behaviors as Marital Protective Factors during Economic Pressure. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39(2); 191-204
Dewi, E. M., Puspitawati, H., & Krisnatuti, D. (2019). The Effect of Social Capital and Husbandwife Interaction on Marital Quality Among Familiesin Early Years and Middle Years Marriage. Journal of Family Sciences, 3(1), 30 -40. https://jurnal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jfs/article/download/25166/16364
Dixon, L. J., Gordon, K. C., Frousakis, N. N., & Schumm, J. A. (2012). A study of expectations and the martial quality of participants of a marital enrichment seminar. Family Relations, 61, 75-89.
Ellis, A. (2003). The nature of disturbed marital interaction. Journal of Rational- Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 21, 147-153.
Gündoğdu R, Yavuzer Y, Karataş Z. Irrational beliefs in romantic relationships as the predictor of aggression in emerging adulthood. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018; 6(3): 108-15.
Hollist. Cody.S, Miller Richard. B. (2005). Perceptions of attachment style and marital quality in midlife marriage. Family Relations, 54, 46-58
Huffman, A. H., Craddock, E. B., Culbertson, S. S., & Klinefelter, Z. (2016). Decision-making and exchange processes of dual-military couples: A review and suggested strategies for navigating multiple roles. Military Psychology, 29(1), 11–26.
Huffman, A. H., Dunbar, N., Broom, T. W., & Castro, C. A. (2018). Soldiers’ perspectives of the Married Army Couples Program: A review of perceived problems and proposed solutions. Military Psychology, 30(4), 335–349.
Johnson Kristina D. (2015). Marital Expectation Fulfillment and its Relationship to Height of Marital Expectations, Optimism, and Relationship Self-Efficacy Among Married Individuals. Dissertations Andrews University
Juvva, S., & Bhatti, R. S. (2006). Epigenetic model of marital expectations. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(1), 61-72.‌
Lisa J. Trump. Angela L. Lamson. Melissa E. Lewis. Amelia R. Muse. (2015). His and Hers: The Interface of Military Couples’ Biological, Psychological, and Relational Health. Journal Contemp Fam Ther (2015) 37:316–328.
Loscocco, K., & Walzer, S. (2013). Gender and the culture of heterosexual marriage in the United States. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(1), 1–14.
Maguire, K. C., Heinemann-LaFave, D., & Sahlstein, E. (2013). “To be so connected, yet not at all”: Relational presence, absence, and maintenance in the context of a wartime deployment. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 249-271. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.757797
Pflieger, J. C., LeardMann, C. A., McMaster, H. S., Donoho, C. J., Riviere, L. A., & Millennium Cohort Family Study Team. (2018). The impact of military and nonmilitary experiences on marriage: Examining the military spouse’s perspective. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(5), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22321
Rasheed, A., Amr, A., & Fahad, N. (2020). Investigating the Relationship between Emotional Divorce, Marital Expectations, and Self-Efficacy among Wives in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 62(1), 19–40. doi:10.1080/10502556.2020.1833290
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140.
Rossetto, K. R. (2013). Relational coping during deployment: Managing communication and connection in relationships. Personal Relationships, 20, 568-586. doi:10.1111/pere.12000
Tuzgöl Dost, M., & Aras, S. (2021). Close relationship belief and self-change as predictors of romantic relationship quality in university students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(1), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.004
Gonczarowski, Y. A., Nisan, N., Ostrovsky, R., & Rosenbaum, W. (2019). A stable marriage requires communication. Games and Economic Behavior, 118: 626-647
Gottman, J. M., & Gottman, J. S. (2015). 10 Principles for Doing Effective Couples Therapy (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). New York: Norton.
Clyde, T. L., Hawkins, A. J., & Willoughby B. J. (2020). Revising premarital relationship interventions for the next generation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 46(1): 149-164
Üstündağ, S. & Zencirci, A. D. (2016). Factors affecting the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A questionnaire study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2(1), 17-25